HB-1269, “Remedies in Employment
Discrimination Cases,” Dies on Tie Vote in the House on Second
Reading
Yesterday, HB-1269, sponsored by Representative Claire Levy
(D-Boulder), died on a tie 32-32 vote in the House on the Second
Reading vote. CACI opposed this bill, which also had been named
a priority for defeat by the CACI Governmental Affairs Council.
The bill would have established the “Workplace Fairness and
Civil Rights and Remedies Act of 2010.” The bill would have
allowed additional remedies of compensatory and punitive damages
in employment discrimination cases brought under Colorado law.
Under current law, plaintiffs who win employment discrimination
and other types of employment claims can recover actual economic
damages, such as lost wages.
CACI appreciates the efforts of the House members who opposed
the bill. The minority-party Republicans present unanimously
opposed HB-1269. They were joined by five majority-party
Democrats--Representatives Joe Rice (Centennial), Jim Riesberg
(Greeley), Christine Scanlan (Dillon), Wes McKinley (Walsh) and
Ed Casso (Commerce City)—and one Independent, Representative
Kathleen Curry (Gunnison). One Republican member, Representative
Jerry Sonnenberg (Sterling), was absent.
Members of the Governmental Affairs Council that actively
worked with CACI to defeat this bill included: Waste Management,
Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association, Colorado
Civil Justice League, Colorado Auto Dealers Association,
Colorado Retail Council, Colorado Motor Carriers Association,
West Chamber Serving Jefferson County, Metro North Chamber of
Commerce and the Arvada Chamber of Commerce. Other business
organizations, such as the Colorado Civil Justice League, which
is mutually affiliated with CACI, opposed the bill. CACI member
DeFilippo Rees Robinette LLC, a lobbying organization, worked
against the bill on behalf of a client, the Colorado Stone, Sand
and Gravel Association.
The CACI Governmental Affairs Council’s concerns with HB-1269
included the following:
- The bill would have made it more lucrative for both the
plaintiff and his or her attorney to file lawsuits against
Colorado employers, which would have encouraged more
lawsuits against employers.
- Small companies don’t have human resources departments
to avoid the many litigation traps they face every time they
make a decision to hire, promote or fire an employee.
Additionally, small firms often do not have the resources to
defend these cases--even meritless cases--and may thus be
incentivized to settle early rather than defend themselves,
thereby encouraging more claims.
- Large companies with 15 or more employees already face
most, but not all, of the bill’s expanded penalties under
Federal law. HB-1269 would have led to "forum shopping" in
employment cases.
- The new employment-related case load, which this bill
would have created, would have further slowed down State
courts--where little employment litigation now takes
place--and would have cost taxpayers.
- Although the General Assembly this session says it is
encouraging new-jobs creation, this bill would have
encouraged new lawsuits that would have made it more costly
for employers to hire new workers or re-hire laid-off
workers.
For an article yesterday on the bill by Ed Sealover,
statehouse reporter for The Denver Business Journal, click here:
http://denver.bizjournals.com/denver/stories/2010/04/12/daily49.html
For further information on the bill, contact Loren Furman,
CACI Vice President of Governmental Affairs, at 303.866.8642 or
via e-mail at
lfurman@COchamber.com or Larry Hudson, CACI contract
lobbyist, at 303.249.4234 or via e-mail at
larry@hudsonga.com
House Finance Committee Chair Again
Lays Over Bill to Eliminate Enterprise-Zone Investment Tax
Credits and Bill to Suspend Credits for Two Years
On Wednesday afternoon, House Finance Committee Chair Joel
Judd (D-Denver) again laid over HB-1396, which he is sponsoring,
that would eliminate the state’s enterprise-zone program, which
is a major tool of state and local economic developers.
Representative Judd also laid over HB-1200, which caps the
enterprise-zone investment tax credit at $250,000 per taxpayer
for income tax years beginning 2011 through 2013 and requires
the taxpayer to defer claiming any amount above $250,000 to tax
year 2014. (See the next article for greater detail about
HB-1200.)
CACI Sends Letters to Legislative
Leaders Urging Opposition to Eight Anti-Business Bills
On Tuesday, CACI President Chuck Berry sent a letter to each
of the four legislative leaders—Senate President Brandon Shaffer
(D-Longmont), Senate Minority Leader Josh Penry (R-Grand
Junction), House Speaker Terrance Carroll (D-Denver) and House
Minority Leader Mike May (R-Parker)—urging them to oppose eight
bills that CACI deems harmful to the state’s business climate.
(One of the bills, HB-1269, mentioned in the letters, died in
the House yesterday, and its demise was described above.) Here
is the text of the letters:
On behalf of the Board of Directors of
the Colorado Association of Commerce and Industry (CACI), I am
writing you to express CACI’s concerns with eight bills that we
view as harmful to Colorado’s business climate.
Two of these bills will increase
business taxes while the other six will add more costs to the
bottom line for firms with unnecessary mandates in such areas as
economic development incentives, workers’ compensation
insurance, taxation, health insurance and employment law.
Earlier this session, the legislature
increased businesses taxes as Colorado companies are struggling
to emerge from the economic recession. In February, the
legislature approved, and Governor Bill Ritter signed into law,
nine bills that increase taxes on businesses by $231.3 million
for the 28 months beginning March 1, 2010.
Two bills of particular concern are
scheduled for a vote tomorrow in the House Finance Committee. If
enacted, these bills would severely damage Colorado’s economic
development efforts to recruit new companies to our state and to
retain the ones that are here now.
The first bill is HB-1396, sponsored by
Representative Joel Judd, Chair of the House Finance Committee.
This bill would eliminate Colorado’s enterprise-zone tax
credits, thus eliminating the most important tool used by state
and local economic development officials.
HB-1396 is opposed not only by CACI but
by numerous companies, local chambers of commerce and local
economic development organizations. This bill would increase
taxes on businesses located in enterprise zones by $37.4 million
in fiscal year 2010-2011 and by $77 million in fiscal year
2011-2012 for a total of $114.4 million over the two fiscal
years.
It is often stated that Colorado has
relatively few tools in its economic-development toolbox when
compared to the other states, including those that surround us
and are our most important competitors in the competitive
struggle for jobs and economic growth. HB-1396 takes aim at one
of the most important economic development tools that Colorado
possesses.
The second bill is HB-1200, which caps
the enterprise-zone investment tax credit at $250,000 per
taxpayer for income tax years beginning 2011 through 2013 and
requires the taxpayer to defer claiming any amount above
$250,000 to tax year 2014. If the taxpayer has to defer credit
exceeding $250,000, the bill allows the taxpayer to carry the
credit forward for 12 income-tax years after the year that the
credit was allowed plus an additional year for the years that
the taxpayer could not take the credit above $250,000.
Currently, any depreciable equipment
purchased and used within an enterprise zone is eligible for a
three percent tax credit. The credit may be used up to $5,000 of
the taxpayer’s tax liability plus fifty percent of the
taxpayer’s liability above $5,000. Here are CACI’s major
concerns with the HB-1200:
- Because HB-1200 caps the
enterprise zone credit at $250,000, it will hurt companies
that invest millions of dollars in equipment to operate
their business;
- If this legislation is adopted,
the unfortunate, likely result will be that companies will
not invest in new equipment until the full credit is
available again in three years; and
- By capping this credit at $250,000
for three years, companies may either be discouraged from
locating in Colorado until the full credit is available or
will look to locate and invest in other states that offer a
higher enterprise-zone credit.
In addition to these proposals, I also
want to call your attention to the following six currently
pending bills that CACI believes will be harmful to the state’s
business climate:
- SB-12 (Violations of the Workers’
Compensation Laws)
- SB-76 (Unreasonable Insurance
Claims Practices)
- HB-1269 (Employment
Discrimination)
- HB-1012 (Workers’ Compensation
Surveillance)
- HB-1350 (Economic Development
Incentives)
- HB-1263 (Limit Deductions on
Compensation)
In general, laws that mandate
restrictions on businesses in the labor-and-employment and
health-care areas, simply drive up the cost-of-doing-business in
Colorado for companies and make our state less competitive with
other states.
In conclusion, CACI urges you to focus
on policies that encourage job retention--sustaining the
private-sector jobs we have now--and lay the groundwork for
Colorado’s economic recovery where we will be restoring lost
jobs and creating new jobs for our workforce.
On behalf of business leaders across
the state, we urge you to make sure that the bills that I have
listed above do not become law and cause significant damage to
our state’s business climate.
CACI members with questions about these bills should contact
Loren Furman, CACI Vice President of Governmental Affairs, at
303.866.8642 or via e-mail at
lfurman@COchamber.com
Health-Care Bills Roundup
Note: the following section was written by Dan Anglin,
CACI Governmental Affairs Representative.
Representative Roberts Sums Up Health-Care Debate: “The
Government Needs a Reality Check”
The HealthCare Council yesterday held its final meeting of
the session. The guest speaker was Representative Ellen Roberts
(R-Durango). Representative Roberts expressed disappointment in
the passing of the Federal health-care bill, which does not
address the issue of containing costs for purchasers of health
insurance. She recommended that citizens “push back harder, even
within their own party” to demand that true health-care reform
continue to be in the forefront of State and Federal
governmental debate next year.
Representative Roberts recommended that anyone who is
interested in understanding how the Federal Health Care Act will
be implemented should review the summaries prepared by the
Kaiser Family Foundation, which can be found at:
http://healthreform.kff.org
The Kaiser Family Foundation is a non-profit,
private-operating foundation focusing on health-care issues in
the United States. The Kaiser Family Foundation is not
associated with Kaiser Permanente or Kaiser Industries.
Representative Roberts recommended that leaders of the
Colorado business community have small “windows of opportunity”
to effect change before the implementation of many of the
individual measures of the Federal health care law and that CACI
should “ look for places to insert yourself into the
conversation and bring the rest of Colorado with you.”
She expressed disappointment in the many health-care bills
being heard in the Colorado General Assembly that have the same
or similar language as the new Federal law, but would be enacted
sooner and would be more restrictive. Specifically, she
expressed disappointment that the discussion surrounding
HB-1160, “Wellness Incentives,” (the only bill that the
HealthCare Council took a position to support this session) has
been surrounded by misconceptions and met with such resistance.
Representative Roberts noted that HB-1160 is the only bill this
session that will reduce the cost for employers and workers to
purchase health insurance and is disappointed that the effort to
get support from the majority party has been so difficult.
Representative Roberts encouraged the HealthCare Council to
continue to be engaged in the health-care reform discussion and
suggested that CACI reach out to its membership to determine how
to be more involved next year, regardless of the outcome of the
November elections. She informed the Council that one of her
goals is to find a way to “remove employers from the picture” in
the discussion of purchasing or providing health insurance to
Coloradoans, but she understands that there are many other
obstacles to overcome before that is a real part of health-care
reform.
Measure to Provide Wellness
Incentives Passes Senate Committee
HB-1160--sponsored by Senator Linda Newell (D-Centennial),
Senator Shawn Mitchell (R-Broomfield), Representative Joe Rice
(D- Centennial), and Representative Amy Stephens
(R-Monument)--passed the Senate Business, Labor and Technology
Committee on Wednesday. Senator Michael Johnston (D-Denver)
offered three amendments to the bill, which were adopted by the
Committee, that require:
- All health plans to offer wellness incentives to all
persons, including dependants;
- All wellness plans to contain culturally and
linguistically appropriate programs and materials; and
- Health-insurance carriers must provide documentation to
the Colorado Division of Insurance that incentives are paid
from the costs savings realized as a result of a covered
person attaining a standard related to a health-risk factor.
CACI is opposed to the amendments added by the Committee and
will work with Senator Johnston to find a better solution than
that which was adopted.
HealthCare Council Bill-Status
Update
Following is the current status of the HealthCare Council’s
priority bills:
- HB-1160, “Wellness Incentives.”
Support. Senate Second
Reading, Monday April 19th.
- HB-1166, “Plain Language in Insurance Policies.”
Neutral. House considered
Senate amendments on April 1st; result was to re-pass.
- HB-1168, “Subrogation.” Oppose.
Awaiting House consideration of Senate amendments.
- HB-1330, “All-Payer Database.”
Neutral. Senate Appropriations Committee, Friday
April 23;
- HB-1234, “Fair Settlement Insurance Claims.”
Oppose. Awaiting House
Second Reading.
- SB-76, “Unreasonable Insurance Claims Practices.”
Oppose. Not yet calendared
in House Judiciary Committee.
For information on health-care bills, contact Dan Anglin,
CACI Governmental Affairs Representative, at 303.866.9641 or via
e-mail at
danglin@COchamber.com
Five Pinnacol Bills Await Senate
Action
Of the seven Pinnacol Assurance bills recommended by the
legislature’s interim Pinnacol committee last year, five that
are of interest to CACI are still in play under the Gold Dome.
HB-1012, “Limiting
Surveillance of Workers’ Compensation Claims,” sponsored by
Senator Morgan Carroll (D-Aurora), remains in the Senate
Judiciary Committee, which she chairs, but has not yet been
scheduled for a vote. CACI and other business organizations
strongly oppose HB-1012 in its current form.
.
Two weeks ago, the Senate Judiciary Committee sent the following
three bills to the Senate Floor for Second Reading:
-
HB-1009,
“Pinnacol Assurance Board of Directors,” sponsored by
Representative Joe Miklosi (D-Denver) and Senator Mary Hodge
(D-Brighton);
-
SB-11,
“Disclosure of Workers’ Compensation Conflicts of Interest,”
sponsored by Senator Morgan Carroll (D-Aurora) and
Representative Miklosi; and
-
SB-12, “Penalties
on Worker’s Compensation Benefits,” sponsored by Senator
Lois Tochtrop (D-Thornton) and Representative Sal Pace
(D-Pueblo).
The Committee sent a fourth bill, SB-13, “Workers’
Compensation Accountability,” sponsored by Senator Hodge and
Representative Su Ryden (D-Aurora), to the Senate Appropriations
Committee, which this morning passed the bill, sending it to the
Senate Floor for Second Reading.
Last week, the House Business Affairs and Labor Committee
killed on a bipartisan, seven-to-four vote one of the Pinnacol
bills, HB-1356, when two Democrats joined the minority
Republicans to oppose the bill. CACI opposed the bill. HB-1356,
sponsored by Representative Su Ryden (D-Aurora), would have
limited the amount of Pinnacol’s risk-based capital that it
keeps in reserve and require Pinnacol to annually return the
excess to businesses that hold Pinnacol workers’ compensation
insurance policies.
For more information on the Pinnacol bills, contact Loren
Furman at 303.866.9642 or via e-mail at
lfurman@COchamber.com
or Dan Anglin, CACI Governmental Affairs Representative, at
303.866.9641 or via e-mail at
danglin@COchamber.com
CACI Councils Status Report
Click here to view a status report on the bills that CACI
Councils have taken a position on.
CACI’s Christine Gavin: Motherhood
Beckons . . .
Christine Gavin has decided not to return to work at CACI
following the birth of her daughter, Grace Annette, on February
2nd. Grace weighed seven pounds, 15 ounces, and was 20 and
one-half inches long. Well known to many CACI members, Christine
worked in the CACI Membership Department for the last seven
years. She joined CACI in March 2000. We wish Christine and her
husband, Patrick Gavin, the very best as they embark on this
new, happy chapter in their lives as parents. And we thank her
for her many years of devoted service to CACI. Christine can be
reached at cngavin@me.com
Upcoming CACI Council Meetings
Council meetings will be held at the CACI Office beginning at
12 Noon. These will be the last Council meetings held during the
2010 session of the Colorado General Assembly, which must
adjourn sine die by Wednesday, May 12th.
- Governmental Affairs Council, Tuesday, April 20th; lunch
sponsored by Melissa Kuipers, Colorado Auto Dealers
Association, whose website is
www.coloradodealers.org
- Labor and Employment Council, Wednesday, April 28th;
lunch sponsored by Mark Moses, Outback Steakhouse, whose
website is www.outback.com
- Governmental Affairs Council, Tuesday, May 4th; lunch
sponsored by Shayne Madsen, Jackson Kelly PLLC, whose
website is
http://www.jacksonkelly.com